Showing posts with label VAT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VAT. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 April 2012

'Pasty Tax' - Vat on freshly prepared food when sold hot or warmish..


In last week budget the Chancellor, George Osborne announced a consultation on a change to VAT rules on freshly prepared food, dubbed the 'pasty tax'. But what exactly is being proposed?

Sadly, this was rather lost by the media with an obsession as to whether David Cameron or George Osborne had eaten any pasties, furthermore it was reported by some newspapers that hot takeaway food would now be subject to VAT.

However, as the law currently stands, standard rate of VAT already applies to food ‘specifically sold for consumption whilst still hot’ (see HMRC Notice 709/1 Catering and take-away food.)

But what if you sell the product cold and provide a microwave for the customer to heat the food themselves? The tax-man has already covered that possibility:

"If you sell food to be taken away for consumption elsewhere, but you make a microwave oven available for your customers to heat up the food, either before or after the till point, you are making a supply of hot food which must be standard-rated. This is the case whether or not you make a charge for the use of the oven."

No, what the Chancellor will be consulting on is a change to the following provision in relation to freshly prepared products:

"If you sell freshly cooked products for consumption while they are still hot they are standard-rated..... Some of these products are, however, not sold with such an intention They may only be hot/warm as they are in the process of cooling down. Examples include pies, pasties, sausage rolls and similar savoury products, cooked chickens or joints of meat, bread products and croissants. The liability will depend, therefore, on how you prepare and sell them."

And if they are sold "warm simply because they happen to be freshly baked, are in the process of cooling down and are not intended to be eaten while hot; or cold or chilled at the time of purchase" then the VAT can be zero rated.

From October it is being proposed that even freshly cooked products if sold hot (warmer than the ambient temperature outside) will have a standard rate of VAT.

Whilst you think about what is actually different between the supply of foods that are cold, be they consumed immediately or not being zero rated, and similar 'warm food' (even if cooling down) which may in the future have a standard rate of VAT, let me talk about the European Union.

The European Union has over the years been legislating with the aim of harmonising VAT across member states. There are currently two VAT rates member states can apply a standard rate (minimum 15%) and a reduced rate (minimum 5%). The UK has a derogation allowing a zero rate of VAT on certain goods.

What is allowed at the reduced rate is specified in Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 as subsequently amended. You will recall I've talked about this directive before in my post about Wales Air Ambulance and VAT.

Which brings us on to Mr Manfred Bog of Germany.

"Mr Bog sold drinks and food prepared for consumption (in particular, sausages and chips) from three identical mobile snack bars at weekly markets. The mobile snack bars were equipped with a sales counter with a glass splashguard, below and around which ran a ‘board’ made from a material sold under the name ‘resopal’ which could be used for the consumption of food on the spot. To the sides of the vehicle, above the drawbar, there was a folding ‘tongue’, which was in the form of a table at the same height and from the same material as the ‘board’ running round the vehicle. The area where customers could consume the food was protected from the rain by a folding roof."

In his tax declaration for 1994 Mr Bog declared the turnover from the sale of drinks as subject to the standard rate of VAT, while the turnover from the sale of food was declared as subject to the reduced rate. The German tax-man disagreed and said that the sale of hot food for immediate consumption should be subject to the standard rate of VAT.

Cutting the story short, in the end the Bundesfinanzhof (German High Court) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
  1. Is the sale of food or meals prepared for immediate consumption a supply of goods within the meaning of Article 5 of [the Sixth Directive]?
  2. Does the answer to Question 1 depend on whether additional service elements are supplied (provision of facilities for consumption)?
  3. If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: is the term ‘foodstuffs’ in category 1 of Annex H to [the Sixth Directive] to be interpreted as covering only foodstuffs to ‘take away’ as typically sold in grocers’ shops, or does it also cover food or meals which have been prepared for immediate consumption by boiling, grilling, roasting, baking or other means?’
You can read preliminary rulings on the European Court of Justice website.

The European Court of Justice(Third Chamber) preliminary ruling was:
  1. Articles 5 and 6 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that:

  2. – the supply of food or meals freshly prepared for immediate consumption from snack stalls or mobile snack bars or in cinema foyers is a supply of goods within the meaning of Article 5 if a qualitative examination of the entire transaction shows that the elements of supply of services preceding and accompanying the supply of the food are not predominant;

    – except in cases in which a party catering service does no more than deliver standard meals without any additional elements of supply of services, or in which other special circumstances show that the supply of the food represents the predominant element of a transaction, the activities of a party catering service are supplies of services within the meaning of Article 6.

  3. In cases of the supply of goods, the term ‘foodstuffs’ in category 1 of Annex H to the Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 92/111, must be interpreted as also covering food and meals which have been prepared for immediate consumption by boiling, grilling, roasting, baking or other means.
Not unsurprisingly the UK Government says this case and others, does not apply to the UK, and it may only be resolved following a lengthy court case.

The VAT Blog in their post HMRC don't believe the WURST will happen here in the UK gives a good summary of HMRC position as detailed in Revenue & Customs Brief 19/11

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Wales Air Ambulance and VAT on Fuel


Most of us would agree that Wales Air Ambulance provides an essential medical service. That is why we  are happy to give donations to the charity that runs this life saver.

Ken Sharpe has been campaigning for some time to exempt fuel the Air Ambulance Service uses from VAT, in a similar way that it is for Lifeboats.

However, the UK Government has said that whilst there is provision for an exemption from VAT for fuel  used in Lifeboats in the European Union VAT directive, there is no other similar exemption that could be applied to other charities.

Ken Sharpe has suggested that if we cannot exempt VAT on fuel for the Air Ambulance Service, the UK Government should instead provide a grant of an equivalent value to the VAT paid on fuel used.

Currently he has an e-petition, which I urge you to sign:

The Air Ambulance Service is forced to meet rising fuel prices year on year including VAT.

The Air Ambulance Service have saved successive governments millions and millions of pounds funded by charitable donations given by the general public to run what has proven to be an essential service.

Whilst the Lifeboat Service has been exempt from VAT on fuel costs since 1977, a similar privilege has not been afforded to the Air Ambulance Service;

We call on the government to have an urgent review of this situation and in doing so We call on the government to return in the form of grants to Air Ambulance Service providers all the future VAT which the Treasury collects from them so that the Air Ambulance Service is in practice exempt from paying VAT in the same way as the Lifeboat Service.


It seems strange to me that should you say have an accident in France, which required that you were flown home by Air Ambulance, that flight would be exempt from VAT. Or should you fall ill at home, the ambulance if it were a vehicle then the fuel used would also be VAT exempt. And if the Air Ambulance flying to your rescue was funded and operated by the National Health Service then the fuel would also be exempt from VAT. But an Air Ambulance if operated by a charity is not?

You can find a summary of the Common system of value added tax (VAT) (‘the VAT Directive’) on the following EU website.

It explains that "For socio-economic reasons, the following are exempted:

certain activities of general interest (such as hospital and medical care, goods and services linked to welfare and social security work, school and university education and certain cultural services);.....


To download the latest consolidated version:  VAT directive in PDF format.

Here under Title IX Exemptions Chapter 7 Article 148 you will find the exemptions for lifeboats:

(a) the supply of goods for the fuelling and provisioning of vessels used for navigation on the high seas and carrying passengers for reward or used for the purpose of commercial, industrial or fishing activities, or for rescue or assistance at sea, or for inshore fishing, with the exception, in the case of vessels used for inshore fishing, of ships' provisions;

Lifeboats are also exempt from VAT for certain equipment by virtue of The Value Added Tax (Equipment in Lifeboats) Order 2002.

Under Title IX Exemptions Chapter 2 Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest there is Article 132 and

1. Member States shall exempt the following transactions:

(c) the provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions as defined by the Member State concerned;


In the first place I think we can all agree that an Air Ambulance Service is in the public interest and/or a certain activity of general or public interest. It's then down to how you define provision I suppose.

I humbly suggest that for the provision of medical care you need supplies and equipment i.e. an ambulance to take the paramedic or doctor to the patient be that a vehicle or an aircraft specifically modified for the purpose, and fuel for the vehicle or aircraft is rather important you would think.

To me as an ordinary member of the public it seems air ambulances used for the provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions are exempt from VAT transactions. And whom provides or pays for the service and the provision of medical care is down to Member states to define.

Most probably an over simplistic interpretation of complex VAT rules of which I have little knowledge, still a neat idea I hope you agree.

Sunday, 1 May 2011

Vat rise bad news for small businesses.

In August 2009, George Osborne, the then shadow chancellor, appearing on the BBC Radio 4 Today program said "There have been absolutely no internal discussions, there are no secret plans for an increase in the VAT rate,"

Although it wasn’t a surprise to most, that when in power that is exactly what they did, by raising VAT to 20% in January, 2011.

A poll by Premierline Direct in January, revealed that a majority of small and medium sized businesses were concerned about the impact of the VAT rise. The poll showed that, overall, 90 per cent of those running small businesses are worried about the effects of the rise.

The Conservative Party, like to portray themselves as the party of the shopkeeper and defender of small businesses. For instance in the Welsh Conservative manifesto they promise to reduce the tax burden of small business, by abolishing the need for many to pay business rates.

A report in todays Sunday Times; headlined "Vat rise is crushing small businesses", by their economics correspondent, Roberts Watts says “Collapse by small business have risen 20% so far this year, in part because of the coalition’s increase in VAT, insolvency experts have said”.

“A tougher stance by the taxman has also contributed to the rise in failures, which is expected to gather pace as the year progresses”.


As the Conservatives point out, SME’s are vital to the economy, and growth in this sector brought about by an ‘entrepreneurial boom’ was seen as essential if the gamble made by George Osborne, the Chancellor; that the jobs lost in the public sector would be replaced by new jobs in the private sector, was to pay dividends.

Some would point out that Labour also increased the rate of VAT to 17.5% when previously in power.

However, what no political party can deny is that in times of austerity, if you cut taxes in one part of the economy you will need to rise taxes elsewhere.

And for the Conservatives to claim that they are the only political party that would help small business doesn’t quite ring true anymore.